【推文】James Lindsay - An important tactic called "Entryism" is an old Soviet technique...
這是 James Lindsay 最近寫的長推文串
連結
原推文 - x.com/conceptualjame...
Thread Reader App版本（一頁版本） - threadreaderapp.com/...
原文及個人翻譯
An important tactic used by wedge movements, Gramscian infiltrators (long march into the institutions to establish counter-hegemonic control), militant ideologies, and especially WOKE is an old Soviet technique called "Entryism." You'll surely recognize it once described. 🧵
Yes, it really is called "entryism," or "entrism," or "boring from within," which is highly descriptive, and it's being used all around you by militant ideological factions including the Woke (how they took our institutions), Woke Right, and Islamists.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entryism
Entryism is in some sense the art of entering an institution and insinuating yourself as a subversive, disruptor, divider, wedge, or plant in order to eventually transform the institution or group from within and bring it into service for your militant ideological ambitions.
The basic premise of the entryist program is to make entrance then purge "enemies" (the existing membership of the institution and the hegemony or culture they maintain). There are lots of ways to enter, and purges are basically all the same.
一種重要策略被稱為「打入主義」（entryism），由葛蘭西（Gramsci）的滲透者（長征入機構以建立反霸權控制）、好戰的意識形態者，尤其是「覺醒」（WOKE）運動所採用。這是一種古老的蘇聯技術，一旦描述，你一定會認出來。
是的，它確實被稱為「打入主義」、「入滲」或「內部分化」，這是一個非常具描述性的詞，目前正被好戰的意識形態派系廣泛使用，包括覺醒運動（他們如何奪取了我們的機構）、覺醒右翼和伊斯蘭主義者。
打入主義某種程度上是一種進入機構的藝術，將自己潛入其中作為一個破壞者、搗亂者、分裂者、楔子或潛伏者，最終從內部轉變機構或團體，並將其服務於你好戰的意識形態野心。
打入主義計劃的基本前提是進入機構，然後清除「敵人」（機構的現有成員以及他們所維持的霸權或文化）。進入的方式有很多，而清除行動基本上都是相同的。
I've outlined a five-step process typical of the entrance part of entryism:
1) Demand access
2) Demand accommodation
3) Demand a seat at the table
4) Demand the table
5) Demand control over the institution
我概述了打入主義中進入階段的典型五步過程：
1) 要求進入
2) 要求容納
3) 要求在桌子旁有一席之地
4) 要求擁有這張桌子
5) 要求對機構進行控制
Fwiw, I've also explained the general concept of "entryism" in a bite-sized podcast.
順便一提，我在一個簡短的播客中解釋了「打入主義」這個概念。
After the infiltrators enter into an institution (which can be a vague one, like a diffuse online community or even a "conversation" that's happening), they'll always begin to use divide, conquer, and purge techniques so they can wrest control of whatever they're attacking.
The four primary ways they do this are:
1) Sow internal discord in the target community
2) Introduce polarizing topics on polarizing terms and polarize around them
3) Use any standing they gain to bring in ideological comrades to increase power
4) Use the above to purge enemies.
滲透者進入機構（這可以是一個模糊的機構，如一個分散的線上社區，甚至是一場「對話」）後，他們總是會開始使用分裂、征服和清除技術，以奪取他們攻擊的目標的控制權。
他們這樣做的四大主要方式是：
1) 在目標社區內播種不和
2) 引入兩極化的話題，並以兩極化的方式圍繞它們進行
3) 利用他們獲得的任何地位，帶入意識形態戰友以增加權力
4) 利用上述方法清除敵人。
Sowing internal discord is pretty easy. They get inside an institution and start talking to people, or injecting views into a conversation, usually of the sort that people recognized as being in leadership are somehow faithless, in error, unfair, etc., to generate agitation.
Introducing polarizing activity is probably the most interesting and important of these topics, but it's probably best for another thread. Generally, this will occur after some controversial event happens, and the goal is to create two hardline stances that polarize the target.
For example, you could wait until after a heated (mostly fake) debate about immigration and then introduce the idea that Ronald Reagan, who is an respected avatar of a prevailing political hegemony they want to destroy, supported immigration in bad ways.
播種內部不和非常容易。他們進入機構後，開始與人們交談，或在對話中注入觀點，通常會指出被認可為領導者的人物某種程度地缺乏信仰、有誤或不公平，以製造動盪。
引入兩極化活動可能是這些話題中最有趣和最重要的，但可能最好留給另一篇文章。一般來說，這會在某個有爭議的事件發生後發生，目標是創造兩個強硬的立場，使目標兩極化。
例如，你可以等待一場關於移民的激烈（主要是假的）辯論結束後，再提出Ronald Reagan這個受人尊敬的、代表著他們想摧毀的普遍政治霸權的化身，以不良的方式支持移民的想法。
The goal is to polarize the group around Reagan and to get at least some of the group to stand for Reagan (old guard to be destroyed) and others to turn against him (new guard who "gets it"). No nuance or complexity will be allowed. That will be made "proof" of being old guard.
The ultimate goals have very little to do with Reagan in this example. The goals are to create conditions for a purge of the existing group in favor of the radical entryists and to undermine the "hegemony" attached to Reagan's legacy, e.g., Shining City on a Hill and anti-Marxism
DEI is a perfect example of an entryist project, by the way. They come in under the guise of doing Civil Rights work to gain access, then manipulate the internal environment to fracture around identity politics construed on Woke (Maoist) terms, then purge "racists" etc.
I did a podcast about that and the subtle way it works too, btw.
目標是將團體兩極化，圍繞里根（Reagan）並至少讓團體中的一些人站出來支持里根（要被摧毀的舊守衛），而其他人則轉向反對他（新守衛，他們「明白」了）。不會允許任何細微差別或複雜性，這將被視為是舊守衛的「證據」。
這個例子中的最終目標與里根（Reagan）幾乎沒有關係。目標是創造條件，以有利於激進的打入主義者的既定目標，並破壞與里根遺產相關聯的「霸權」，例如「山巔之城」和反馬克思主義。
順便提一下，DEI（多元、公平、包容）是打入主義項目的完美例子。他們以進行民權工作為藉口進入，獲得進入權後，操縱內部環境，根據覺醒（毛主義者）的觀點，圍繞身份政治分裂，然後清除「種族主義者」等。
我還做了一個關於這個話題的播客，詳細介紹了它微妙的運作方式。
The idea that radicals seeking to effect an institutional takeover and cultural revolution (that is, Gramscian activists) would use whatever power they have to bring in their friends (while purging enemies) is a no-brainer that requires no explanation.
Under an entryist program, though, like Woke Right, just know this: to hire one of them is to hire ten of them because that's exactly what they're going to do with the power afforded to them by getting inside. They'll bring in their friends. Just like the Woke Left did with DEI.
Finally, though I've already kind of explained it, the entryist radicals will use anything they get to purge their enemies (the legitimate representatives of the institution). All of the above tactics lead up to these last two points, which transform around "personnel is policy."
So-called "old guard" members will be increasingly accused of unrecognizable sins they're expected to atone for while being pressured out. Divisive and salacious narratives will be spun to disgrace them within their own communities. They'll be purged.
激進分子尋求進行機構接管和文化革命（即葛蘭西活動家）的想法，他們會利用手中的權力帶入朋友（同時清除敵人），這是一個不需要解釋的顯而易見的事實。
然而，在打入主義計劃下，例如覺醒右翼，請記住：雇用他們中的任何一個人，就等於雇用他們中的十個人，因為這正是他們在進入內部後，利用所獲得的權力要做的事情。他們會帶入自己的朋友，就像覺醒左翼在DEI（多元、公平、包容）項目中所做的那樣。
最後，雖然我已經在某種程度上解釋過了，打入主義激進分子將利用他們所獲得的任何權力清除他們的敵人（機構的合法代表）。上述所有策略都指向最後兩點，圍繞著「人員即政策」進行轉變。
所謂的「舊守衛」成員將被越來越多地指控犯有不可識別的罪過，他們被期望為之贖罪，同時受到壓力被趕走。分裂和淫穢的敘事將被編造出來，在他們自己的社區內羞辱他們。他們將被清除。
The goal of entryism is to enter and then take over some institution, broadly construed, and to bring it under the control of the radical militant ideology using the entryist tactics. The Woke Left did this to us already. The Woke Right is doing it to us now. Don't let them!
打入主義的目標是進入並接管某個機構（廣泛意義上），並利用打入主義策略將其置于激進好戰的意識形態控制之下。覺醒左翼已經對我們這樣做了。覺醒右翼正在對我們這樣做。不要讓他們得逞！