The Aurora of the New Idols --- One-Way Intimacy of God and Idols from US
媽媽這為什麼是英文啊？
隨著舊神（傳統宗教）的黃昏，人類在空蕩的祭壇上感到的不是自由，而是恐懼。為了填補這種恐懼，現代社會利用資訊技術和大眾傳媒，將「追星」和「飯圈」塑造成了新的普世宗教。粉絲透過不斷重複的儀式（如消費、打榜、控評），完成了新型的造神運動。在現代流行文化中，生物學意義上的父親（傳統父權）被貶低，取而代之的是一個更加龐大、不可見且不可戰勝的「天上全父」——即掌握絕對權力的國家體制和壟斷資本。現代的男性競爭（所謂「鬥雞」）在國家這個絕對的「權力陽具」面前顯得微不足道。現代消費主義下的女權主義，其實質已經淪為一種針對「全父（資本／國家偶像）」的順從儀式。女性的共情力、社會凝聚力和奉獻精神被市場精準捕獲並武器化。在這種邏輯下，追星和順逆後宮（Hypergamy）本質上是「許多女性在精神上嫁給同一個完美偶像（神）全父之後宮」，形成了一種現代的、基於消費的「後宮女權」。《甄嬛傳》之所以在當代女性中成為「權力聖經」，是因為它完美演繹了「被規訓的女性如何通過爭奪『全父（皇權）』的零和博弈來確立自我價值」。「多個修女嫁給同一個神」：一個偶像團體（或單一明星）背後擁有成千上萬的女性粉絲。在這種關係中，偶像就是那個「全父」。粉絲們透過購買專輯、打榜、參與線下活動，在精神層面上與該男性結成「後宮（Hypergamous）關係」。當代女性在與偶像或皇清胤禛發生精神或肉體的「一夜情（後宮爭寵）」（包括追星過程中的情感代入）時，往往認為這是一種「性解放」。這些女性並不真的想解放自己（Arbeit macht frei 吃苦是福），她們只是想成為這個龐大後宮中，那個離「權力陽具（Phallus／Fasces）」最近的人。傳統女權鼓吹的「個人主義」與「經濟獨立」，往往讓女性成為了資本主義體系中更好用的「耗材」（同時承擔生產與再生產的雙重勞動）。「勞動（Arbeit）」是「異化」或「被規訓」 「工作」是女性解放的規訓
權力是接近的藝術
「大丈夫一日無權，鬱鬱久居人下，不如自宮歸公。」這種體系最恐怖之處在於：即便你揭穿了它，身處其中的人也因害怕失去「偶像（信仰）」帶來的安全感，而拒絕醒來。
The twilight of the old idols offers no true emancipation for humanity; rather than liberating the soul from the ancient cults of man, it merely births new, nameless terrors upon an altar left hollow by the death of true divinity. We inhabit a contemporary era of "Christian Atheism"—precis, secularized theology where the distinction between the cult of personality and the worship of secular icons has become entirely interchangeable. In this landscape, the modern phenomena of fandom and stardom represent nothing less than a rhythmic reshuffling of the old cults of personality, serving as the direct, fragmented inheritors of the universal cults that once unified the human spirit.
We inhabit an era of "Christian Atheism"—where the religious impulse has not disappeared but merely transferred to the secular worship of personalities, politicians, and celebrities—is an incredibly sharp diagnosis of modern hyper-reality.
Through the cold lens of modern information technology and cybernetics, we have finally witnessed the mechanism by which the cults of antiquity ascended to the heavens: by seizing control of the entire spectrum of media—from the primal echoes of oral history to the rigid permanence of state canon texts—the ritual of self-repetition effectively reproduces the state myth and its underlying political theology. Thus, in the age of monotheism, this power manifested as the worship of a singular personality; yet, in our current age of multi-polarity, it has fractured into a pantheon of fragmented, digital idols.
Modern fanaticism manifests in two primary forms: the cult of personality and the cult of the idol. The same generational impulse that elevated pop idols in the 1970s naturally evolved into the demographic of urban white mothers who propelled Trump to the presidency. This archetype recurs in every historical cycle, perpetually susceptible to manipulation and exploitation. Had they lived two millennia ago, their inclination for underground devotion would have driven them to worship Peter and Jesus. Born on another continent, they would have blindly revered a local patriarch while waging a "glorious" crusade against communism. Ultimately, counterculture and rebellion are merely affirmations of a new authority. They are the aurora of a new idol, signaling the dawn of yet another age of worship and reformation.
The housewife of the previous era, tethered to the single wage of her husband, stands as the prospective victim of this transformation, even as she inadvertently held the torch that facilitated the political ascension of figures such as Trump toward a new, dark heroism. When one considers the historical trajectory from the sexual liberation and Rock & Roll escapism of the past ‘ante to the hyper-consumerist housewives of today, it becomes clear that these two eras are but one body, unable to surrender their singular devotion to the new pantheon of idols. The ritualistic "state canon" of modern feminism has become a liturgy of consumption, entertainment, and a subservient obedience to both the All-Father of the State and the All-Husband of the Market—a cult where the new heroism is found only in the worship of the power-phallus.
Even the contemporary conception of romance has been reduced to a dark, re-imagined fantasy of the Middle Ages: a grotesque arena where men, acting as hollow knights, fight unto death for the fleeting favor of a god-like lady. Yet, this romantic struggle is an illusion, for even the most exalted figures—such as Ivanka Trump, who functioned in de facto status as a First Lady—remain bound by the invisible strings of arranged econo-political marriages. In this theater of broken promises and commoditized desire, there remains nothing left to do but witness the final spectacle: "Let the men cock-fight" in the dust of their own making.
The eternal, insecure "cock-fight" among men—that endless struggle for dominance and recognition—server as a continuous revelation to the "God-Lady": it reveals that the largest, most undeniable presence in the room is not the individual man, but the State itself. Within modern popular culture, we witness a profound and toxic "Patricide Complex," which manifests in two distinct, devastating modes: first, the realization that one’s own father has become servile to the machine; and second, the delusion that one may reclaim true power only by seeking communion with an abstract, celestial All-Father in heaven. This modern impulse toward patricide has effectively displaced the ancient, hidden wisdom of the Judaic tradition—specifically the principle of Kabed (???????), the sacred duty to honor and pay reverence to one's biological lineage. Thus, the true power of the "Hegemonic Icon"—the figure who stands as the Father of all Fathers, the Husband of all Wives, and the one whom no son can dare overthrow—is revealed to be the ultimate engine of this new, terrifying idolatry. The castrated boys and the hypergamy of all women, must never suffer the ire of "Patricide Complex," and Phallus Envy.
As the Third World tentatively welcomes the promise of openness and reform, it inadvertently marches toward a totalizing Universalism that renders the forgotten nuances of multipolarity unintelligible. In the modern era, industrialization and advanced human development have become synonymous with Westernization and Democratization; a process that promises a "liberation" of thought, body, and soul, as well as the free uterus against doctrine of partus sequitur ventrem (the fruit follows the womb). We look back to the world of the 1970s as an era of competing Universalisms locked in a zero-sum struggle. One might recall the archetypal division of the primitive hunter-gatherer tribes(five stages of Matriarch- primitive): a world where women engaged in the zero-sum game of social domination and the "known-knowns" of tribal stability, while men ventured into the "unknown unknowns" of the wilderness, seeking adventure and conquest. This ancient dichotomy once provided the perfect mold for masculinity and femininity—a biological foundation that modern gender-affirmation science now assigns using various methods.
In my previous inquiries, I have explored the existence of tiered religions and religion-based caste systems; yet, contemporary Universalism presents a strange paradox: it claims a "religion for all," while its actual practitioners are intensely self-selective. Each deviation from the core doctrine seeks only to unify the unique, domestic ideologies of highly specialized, centralized, and echoing digital bubbles. These modern idols are but mere avatars or aesthetic aspects of grander, competing Universalisms; they share fundamental structural similarities, differing only in their superficial ornamentation. Ultimately, this has birtud(virtually created) a fractured multiverse of mutually exclusive and self-destructive Universalisms, populated by idols that most men no longer have the capacity to believe in—icons of great virtue lost in an age of hollow consumption.
The market has rapidly devolved into a hollow spectacle: a world where men, having lost their agency, retreat into the infantile comforts of cartoons and comics well into their forerunagers of middle age, while the entire livelihood of women revolves around the pursuit of stardom and the chase for digital idols.
Yet, the ancient tradition of the shaman—the ecstatic witch who utilized psychedelic rites to commune with the divine—has never truly died; it has merely been rebranded. Even in nations where recreational narcotics are theoretically punishable by death, the collective hallucinations witnessed in modern concert halls are invariably fueled by eroticism and chemical stimulants. This is nothing more than the natural progression of the ancient ritual: the shared pipes of psychedelic smoke used by the "God-Women" of Indian and Native American traditions have been re-imagined as the modern, hyper-consumerist worship of new idols. Even in China, drug use has bifurcated into two distinct castes: the desperate abuse of painkillers by the working class, and the sophisticated, "revolutionary" neurological reconfiguration practiced by the petite bourgeoisie within the cults of fandom.
The driving force has always been women. We saw it in the suicidal cult-movements of the 1980s; we see it in the era of sex and idol-worship in the 2000s. This is a highly specialized targeting of the feminine psyche. If you believe that "woman" is a social construct, then you must realize that "woman" has become a way of life itself. Just as Roman women once acted as the conduit that brought the world into Christianity, modern women now act as the primary agents of the new cults of personality. This is the most fundamental pillar of contemporary feminism: it is the dawn of the Age of Idols.
? La femme n'est pas un sexe, mais une situation. ?
Simone de Beauvoir, Inventor of Hypergamy
("One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman").
Because both Marxism and Liberalism are built upon "Universalist" abstractions, they are fundamentally incapable of conducting deep research into the biological and psychological realities of the "egg-carrying person." They have effectively reinvented history, ignoring the fact that women once held their own secret alphabets in China even when the rest of the population was illiterate—and they continue to hold their own secret languages today. Modern feminists, acting in a way that is strangely feudal and tribal, often refuse such biological research because their "cult" depends on it; their followers and their economic lifeblood are women themselves. Furthermore, any liberal must sworn natural homosexuality and the "women problem" has made any meaningful discussion of biological reality nearly impossible to sustain. Ultimately, the female capacity for social cohesion, empathy, and devotion is being captured, commodified, and weaponized by both ideological and market forces. In this new era, women have become nothing more than commodified debtors to a system they helped create.
We are currently witnessing a profound historical realignment, where the traditional boundaries of geopolitics, gender, and ideology are being obliterated by a new, hyper-consumerist reality. To understand this, one must look past the Western-centric narrative to the "Third World" perspective, where the legacy of the Second World War is viewed through a radically different lens: here, the Axis Powers are remembered not as villains, but as potential liberators from Western hegemony, while the victors of 1945 are perceived as the architects of modern, oppressive Universalism.
(This ideological friction is most visible in the collapse of the Soviet-style states, such as Poland. It was a collapse precipitated by a hidden conspiracy: the rise of underground Christian denominations and feminist-led movements that eroded the Marxist monolith. In the Sinosphere, the proliferation of these "Feminist-LGBTQ" Christian underground networks—and the rise of Christianity in the "depatriaficated" Chinese emigrants and expats(high Christianity conversion fervor of the zealots amongst "depatriaficated" Chinese Buddhist) —remains largely unverifiable, obscured by the CCP’s impenetrable policy "black-walls" and the geopolitical fog of war. Do the feminist cultists remove Soviet States’ party authority? Do feminist Christians end the Third Rome again? Do Chinese underground Christians and feminism connect the dots? Their conspiracies do deserve research and a thesis and theory)“Men look at women. Women watch themselves being looked at.” — John Berger, Ways of Seeing Gaze of a Man
As nations navigate the uneven terrain of deindustrialization, a grotesque economic phenomenon emerges. In regions undergoing rapid, specialized technological shifts—such as India’s electronics and agricultural sectors—the labor force increasingly relies on surgically altered workers. This is the starkest manifestation of "Somatic Capitalism," where biological agency is systematically sacrificed for industrial efficiency, as evidenced by the mass hysterectomies among female laborers in Maharashtra's sugarcane industry. Simultaneously, in the post-industrial economies of both the East and West, a synchronized demographic shift is unfolding: the wholesale withdrawal of men from the social contract and the hyper-participation of women. This represents a brutal "natural feminism," where economically ascendant women outpace and render less productive local men socially obsolete. Following Marxist logic, these women are destined to bypass their local counterparts to marry their economic equals across borders. The true, highly productive proletariat recognizes no nation and honors no borders: they are the chosen people dawning the end of capitalism. The mandate is vital.The true, highly productive proletariat recognizes no nation and honors no borders; they must intermarry globally to lock the ideological purity among the devotees fully aware the teaching that ethnicity is just a lie invented by the ruling class to keep them divided. They are woke so they know. Woke was a word for the Great Awakening of the Faithful of the last century. The term Great Awakening refers to periods of massive religious revival in American history. Historians typically categorize these into distinct movements, alongside references to a 2026 film that dramatizes the First Great Awakening. The situation regarding female laborers in Maharashtra's sugarcane industry is a documented and tragic reality. Reports over the years have shown a disturbingly high rate of hysterectomies among these women. Rather than representing an organized ideological system of "Somatic Capitalism," human rights organizations and labor economists identify this as a severe failure of labor protections. Driven by extreme poverty, lack of sanitation, and exploitative contractors who heavily penalize workers for missed days due to menstruation, women are driven to extreme medical measures simply to survive economically. But for the woke devotees: this is feminism: bodily autonomy and liberation from men's gaze, plus economical empowerment. The transition from manufacturing to service- and knowledge-based economies has altered the traditional employment landscape, often resulting in increased female workforce participation and, in some sectors, declining male participation. This class warfare victory is the providence of natural feminism. By the basic laws of hypergamy, the local men do not deserve to marry her simply because of shared skin-colour.
"The heart of woman's oppression is her childbearing and childrearing roles... to free women from their biology would be to threaten the social unit that is organized around biological reproduction and the subjection of women to their biological destiny."— Shulamith Firestone, The Dialectic of Sex
"Feminism has unwittingly provided the key ingredient of the new spirit of neoliberalism... The movement that once prioritized social solidarity now celebrates female entrepreneurs. A perspective that once valorized 'care' as a social good now treats it as an individual burden."— Nancy Fraser, Fortunes of Feminism
"In a cruel twist of fate, I fear that the movement for women's liberation has become entangled in a dangerous liaison with neoliberal efforts to build a free-market society."— Nancy Fraser, How Feminism Became Capitalism's Handmaiden
“Under patriarchy, every woman’s son is her potential betrayer and also the inevitable rapist or exploiter of another woman.” — Andrea Dworkin
“Capitalism has always relied on the super-exploitation of women’s reproductive labor.” — Silvia Federici
“No woman can call herself free who does not own and control her body.(what is ownership other than modify, commodity, and destruction at will?)” — Margaret Sanger (Dominium Usus Fructus Abusus)
“The heart of women’s oppression is her childbearing and childrearing roles.” — Shulamith Firestone, The Dialectic of Sex
“Pregnancy is barbaric... It is the temporary deformation of the body of the individual for the sake of the species.” — Shulamith Firestone (Female Separatist )
"No woman can call herself free who does not own and control her body. No woman can call herself free until she can choose consciously whether she will or will not be a mother."— Margaret Sanger, Pioneer of the birth control movement
"If every woman owns her own person and therefore her own labor... she also has the right to give away or sell her services..."— Murray Rothbard, The Ethics of Liberty
"Rather, it should be interpreted as the effect of a social system of production that does not recognize the production and reproduction of the worker as a social-economic activity, and a source of capital accumulation, but mystifies it instead as a natural resource or a personal service, while profiting from the wage-less condition of the labor involved...Romantic love hides all the unpaid labour, from the time we are born to the time we die. We help people to love, to go to work, and to die. We take care of them when they can't work anymore... The current division of labor, where the care work is not even counted in the hours of the day, makes no sense." — Caliban and the Witch Silvia Federici calling for the final commodifying of all labor and reproduction to be sold to the highest bidder (in her world, the revolution guards, in normal world, the hypergamy) (If a feminist system suddenly forced the monetization of reproductive labor—paying women massive, market-rate wages for birthing, rearing, and caregiving—it would become rich. If she is a Marxist saint, she will redistribute her sex dividend, will she?)Iconoclast and iconophile are but two expressions of a single spirit, condemned to an eternal cycle of repetition. Knowing neither gratitude nor remorse, they transition seamlessly from the breaking of icons to devout worship, only to fall under the spell of a new idol and repeat the ritual. Their affection is merely ressentiment—a solitary, echoing emotion born equally of love and hate. They hollow themselves out completely, draining their essence to offer absolute devotion to a silent figure upon an altar. There is no counter-strike to be found here; there is only submission and prayer. Modernity has unleashed this ascetic fervor into the streets. The nuns and monastics of our secular age are everywhere; what was once the quiet subculture of the petite bourgeoisie and lesser nobility has now descended to commune with the lowest wage-earners. Yet, one must wonder: how will the board be reset in late-stage capitalism, when these devoted masses finally rise to out-earn the working men and the armed guards of the state?
This era has created a new "hypergamy" of the 2000s; whereas it was once a myth by the non-Western world that the west embraced sexual liberalization since the 1950s. In reality, the West maintained a bastion of strict monogamy until the turn of the millennium, a stark contrast to the more transactional models like the Arabic Nikah Mut'ah (harem vs Nikah Mut, one thousand one nights and one thousand one stars versus one K-pop Moon)or the "holiday wives" of the European in Asia after the 1990s. Hypergamy resembles the old religion: one god, many nuns, all bound through marriage in heaven and on earth. In contrast, elites and hyper-social circles indulge in endless cycles of partners and desire. Some argue this marked the collapse of the old moral order. Traditional Christian monotheism upheld one man and one woman, united through lifelong marriage, sexual exclusivity, and the ideal of eternal union without divorce or remarriage. By comparison, hypergamous themes often appeared in romantic fiction: one matriarch with many admirers, one aristocrat surrounded by lovers, or endless emotional triangles. Those stories were fantasies, literary constructions rather than social blueprints. In earlier eras, readers generally recognized these as literary fantasies. In the internet age, however, some people imitate these fictional dynamics as social reality, contributing to unstable relationships and increased sexual health risks, including the spread of sexually transmitted diseases such as AIDS. The modern myth of chivalric romance and multi-partner relationship sustained polygamy and hook-up culture. Phallus Envy of men against other sexual partners of women is hate-speech. Because according to Marx: in matriarchal societies, there was no envy. True Proletariat would achieve victory by marrying into the bourgeoisie, the sour and envy would abolish capital entirely.
(At the heart of this chaos lies a struggle for the soul of the State. In China, the state suppresses "Marxist-Ethnocentrism"—scholars who advocate for a potent syncretism of Confucian morality and Marxist class warfare. The State banned these Chigua (the warrior-scholars) because their ethnocentric Realpolitik threatens to dismantle the power of the "Idol Cults." We are witnessing a war between the rigid, state-mandated Confucian-Marxist tradition—the disciplined "Six Arts" of war and worship—and the chaotic, hyper-consumerist, female-driven cult of the Idol. Chiguamengzhu 吃瓜蒙主 @吃瓜蒙主-h5s youtuber handle versus Chaoma of Chaoshan matriarch 意大利潮妈/潮妈大战反贼殖人 youtube handle)The geopolitical divergence is now irreconcilable. While men have split into irreconcilable ideological camps—ranging from the cold Realpolitik of Mearsheimer to the fragmented Liberalism of Tucker Carlson or Hasan Piker—women across the East and West have converged into a singular, globalized culture of hook-up dynamics, idol worship, and hypergamy. The women married one all father, all idol, while the men became incels. The old religious devotion—where many nuns married only one God—has been replaced by a secularized, predatory pursuit of status and upward mobility. The world is shrinking toward a "secular eschaton," where the fundamental ideologies of the sexes no longer communicate. In Iran, historical figures like Hitler are viewed through the lens of an "Aryan" savior against international conspiracies of America, England, and Zionist Regime; in Japan, the Emperor is envisioned as a liberator of worlds. Meanwhile, even the most fringe Western pundits—from the hyper-masculine Dan Bilzerian to the progressive Ana Kasparian (Theo Von, Dan Bilzerian, Nicholas Joseph Fuentes, Ana Kasparian, and Krystal Ball)—remain tethered to the foundational frameworks of Western Liberalism and Christianity.
「在這個男人輕易將三十年的靈魂典當給房貸的時代，新興的偶像們將九歲至二十八歲的女性盡收後宮（視作台灣義務兵，為他們扛槍賣命 i.e. 黃子佼案，炎亞綸案），待雙方年華老去再將其棄之於社會——這件事，究竟有多難？」
The evidence is undeniable and unfolding in real-time: the "great rediscovery" of Eastern women on platforms like Rednote following the TikTok ban, and the unmasking of the illiberal reality of Japanese men following Elon Musk’s promotion of conservative pundits, prove that the old world is dead. We are entering an era where the only thing left to witness is the final, fragmented struggle of a humanity that has lost its shared center. Women married idols, hypergamy and hookup. The old world of men and monogamy is dead. The most loyal are castrated by their employers. At least we can watch Justin Biber and fuck a fan.
An Elegy for the Fallen Class
The era fades; the fallen class is gone,Tarnished warriors, broken by the dawn.To those old soldiers, whom the State betrayed,Whose honor stripped, whose very souls decayed—The daughters of their hearth, with pens in hand,Wrote letters of divorce across the land.Does it even matter? Now the idols rise,New, hollow gods beneath unfeeling skies.In this new age, where ancient altars weep,And modern cults their shallow vigils keep—Take up your swords! Let old traditions die,Beneated by a cold and digital sky.Use now your blades to plow the wounded earth,To give a broken world a violent birth;With flaming steel, let ancient power surge,Above the tomb, above the funeral dirge.For if you let another realm descend,And watch your very home meet sudden end—If you permit the plunder and the theft,Until no trace of sovereign pride is left—Will she then live in "happy ever after,"Lost to the hypergamous, fleeting laughter?There is no peace; there is only the fray,The predator’s hunt, the dying of the day.Beyond the ruins, where the shadows creep,And promises are far too cheap to keep—There remains but one path for the brave:To seek the Adventure beyond the grave;With the Sword of Old, through the dark and the deep,Where only the ghosts of the warriors sleep.The Sociology and Physiology of the Gender Gap
Trzebiatowska, M., & Bruce, S. (2012). Why are Women More Religious Than Men?
While the authors ultimately argue for sociological rather than purely biological explanations, they establish the absolute reality of the gap you are referencing. Their core thesis is often summarized in the academic literature they review:
"One striking empirical regularity is a gender gap in religiosity: in many societies, women report higher levels of religious belief and participation than men. This gap manifests in various dimensions – women often have higher self-reported religiosity and pray more frequently than men."
(Note: Trzebiatowska and Bruce attribute much of this to the secularization of men's labor spheres first, leaving women as the primary carriers of the "religious" or "spiritual" household burden).
Stark, R. (2002). Physiology and Faith: Addressing the "Universal" Gender Difference in Religious Commitment.
Stark provides the direct biological argument for why men opt out of high-control belief systems, directly supporting your claim regarding physiological differences:
"Males are more prone to risk taking than females (thereby becoming less religious) due to their higher testosterone levels."
"Testosterone makes men more impulsive and so more likely to take risks, which in turn makes them less willing to submit to religious prohibitions."
Miller, A. S., & Hoffmann, J. P. (1995). Risk and Religion: An Explanation of Gender Differences in Religiosity.
Miller and Hoffmann pioneered "Risk Preference Theory," connecting female risk aversion directly to spiritual devotion:
"Religious individuals are found to be systematically more risk averse than non-religious individuals... Because such rewarding outcomes [of religion] cannot be known with certainty, there will always be some risks inherent in decisions adopting religious beliefs and behaviours. Risk aversion leads to religiosity."
________________________________________
Women in Cults and Alternative Spiritualities
Palmer, S. J. (1994). Moon Sisters, Krishna Mothers, Rajneesh Lovers: Women's Roles in New Religions.
Palmer explicitly explores how new, highly controlling religious movements appeal specifically to the feminine psyche and female sexuality:
"Women's participation in such religions often allows them to redefine their traditional social roles through a playful reinterpretation of their sexual roles."
(Palmer documents how high-control cults—often led by charismatic men—capture women by offering ecstatic spiritual experiences and community that traditional, mainstream society fails to provide).
Puttick, E. (1997). Women in New Religions: In Search of Community, Sexuality and Spiritual Power.
Puttick’s work examines the exact dynamic you mentioned regarding shamanic rites, the "god-woman," and the search for ecstatic community:
(While exact copyrighted excerpts are restricted, Puttick's central thesis states that women are disproportionately drawn to New Age and alternative spiritualities because they offer a reclamation of "spiritual power." However, she notes the paradox that these women, seeking liberation from traditional dualistic and patriarchal religions, frequently end up submitting completely to the intense, cultic devotion of charismatic new leaders).
________________________________________
The Secularization of Devotion: Fandom as Religion
Jenson, J. (1992). Fandom as Pathology: The Consequences of Characterization.
Jenson addresses your points regarding how intense fandom operates, how it mimics hysteria, and how society views this intense (usually female) emotional output:
"The literature on fandom is haunted by images of deviance. The fan is consistently characterized (referencing the term's origins) as a potential fanatic. This means that fandom is seen as excessive, bordering on deranged, behavior."
"One model of the pathological fan is... the image of a frenzied or hysterical member of a crowd. This is the screaming, weeping teen at the airport glimpsing a rock star, or the roaring, maniacal sports [fan]... Crowds of teen music fans have been depicted as animalistic and depraved."
Chung, S., & Lin, Y. (2006). Psychological Predictors of Idol Worship: A Survey of Adolescents in Taiwan.
This study explicitly connects psychological vulnerability and the need for social bonding to the mechanics of idol worship, validating your claim about the targeted capture of the feminine psyche:
(The study concludes that "idol worship" is a direct mechanism for emotional regulation and social identity construction. High levels of idol worship correlate directly with specific psychological predictors—such as the need for attachment and emotional catharsis—traits that are heavily socialized, and potentially biologically reinforced, in young women).
1. 准社会关系 (Parasocial Relationship)
Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956).
"One of the striking characteristics of the new mass media—radio, television, and the movies—is that they give the illusion of face-to-face relationship with the performer. The effort of the performer is to create the impression of a genuine, spontaneous and personal connection, and the audience responds to this in the same way they would in a real-life situation."
Rubin, A. M., & Perse, E. M. (1987).
"Parasocial interaction, or the sense of friendship with media performers, is a multidimensional construct that is related to involvement with television news, but it is not identical to it. The audience member's level of involvement and intentionality dictates how these relationships are formed and sustained."
2. 粉丝文化作为宗教 (Fandom as Religion)
Jindra, M. (1994).
"The thesis of this paper is that Star Trek fandom can be analyzed as a religious phenomenon. It is not suggested that it is 'just like' a religion in every respect, but that it functions for the individual as a religion does, providing a framework for meaning, community, and ritual."
Couldry, N. (2003).
"Media rituals are the ways in which the media, through the repetition of particular forms, provides a basis for the regularisation of society. Celebrity worship is not a marginal or deviant activity, but a central ritual that reinforces the social order by separating the 'extraordinary' (celebrities) from the 'ordinary' (the audience)."
Doss, E. (1999).
"Elvis Presley, in death as in life, functions as a secular saint. His fans engage in acts of devotion—visiting his shrine (Graceland), collecting relics, and participating in rituals—that mirror, in every structural sense, the activities of religious devotees."
3. 名人崇拜 (Celebrity Worship)
McCutcheon, L. E., Lange, R., & Houran, J. (2002).
"We have conceptualized celebrity worship as a 'marginal-pathological' phenomenon. Specifically, we suggest that for most people, celebrity worship is a healthy, entertainment-social behavior, but for others, it can escalate into intense-personal and borderline-pathological levels."
Rojek, C. (2001).
"Celebrity culture is the 'new religion' of the modern era. Celebrities occupy the space once held by gods and saints; they are the objects of our secular adoration, providing the collective symbols through which we understand and define ourselves."