Jules Vela

@cosmicray

Not worth reading《隱權力》

爛Not worth reading

被看見的資格:Hidden Figures

The opening of Hidden Figures immediately moved countless viewers to tears.

再次閱讀《The Second Sex》波伏娃(simone de beauvior)上

「Who is in charge?Who really matters?」Men keep finding new ways to show off women — and to remind them they’re replaceable.

讀《认同自己:如何超越与生俱来的弱点》下

每日讀書計劃,自己計時讀書。 《认同自己:如何超越与生俱来的弱点》史蒂芬妮。 斯塔爾

讀《认同自己:如何超越与生俱来的弱点》

每日讀書計劃,自己計時讀書。 《认同自己:如何超越与生俱来的弱点》史蒂芬妮。 斯塔爾

他關心弱者,凝視底層,試圖以微弱卻真誠的力量喚醒民智。

戶晨風,是這個時代仍敢於直視苦難的少數人之一。他想幫人堵住『命運』的槍,他們卻嘲諷他自不量力,多管閒事,你以為就你能耐。

當好人付出代價:威權結構下被消音的美德

“多一事不如少一事”、事不關己。人為何變冷漠、為何不作為、為何服從權威、為何懼怕權力

草稿〈不必點開〉

〈不必點開〉草稿(無需閱讀)working draft

因果的冷漠:東亞宿命倫理的暴力學

因果與冷漠麻木——東亞因果論如何美化暴力與製造受害者沉默

「東亞男性的天性」骗局

所謂的「男人天性」從來不是自然法則,而是一場制度化的洗腦工程。它以演化論為遮羞布,將父權權力的佔有慾偽裝成生物本能,讓男性得以在道德與制度上免責,讓女性在被傷害、被背叛、被消耗之後,依然被迫沉默。

〈不必點開〉草稿(無需閱讀)working draft

Structural Traps of Power: Fishpond Effect, Hidden Monopoly Gate, Yin–Yang Monopoly of Rights, and the Ice‑Hole Dilemma(已录入) Author: Jules Vela Affiliation: Independent Scholar / Feminist Cultural Critic Working Paper — SSRN Submission Rights/License note: I, jules vela, am the rightsholder. I grant SSRN a non-exclusive license to post and distribute this paper. All rights reserved. No third-party figures are reproduced; external data are summarized with attribution. Date written: 2025-09-05 · First posted to SSRN: 2025-09-06 · This version: 2025-09-06 Abstract This paper advances a unified conceptual framework for diagnosing how modern institutions can simultaneously prohibit, tolerate, and legitimize systemic violence and exploitation. It integrates four original concepts: the Fishpond Effect (formal prohibition that functions as de facto encouragement), the Hidden Monopoly Gate (resources nominally public but…

〈不必點開〉初稿(無需閱讀)working draft

The Shame Mechanism and Female Subjectivity in East Asian Patriarchy Author: Jules Vela Abstract This paper explores the role of shame as a structural mechanism within East Asian patriarchal culture and its profound impact on female subjectivity. Unlike guilt, which targets specific actions, shame attacks the self, thereby functioning as an internalized form of social control. By examining the intersections of cultural aesthetics, psychology, neuroscience, and historical comparison, this study demonstrates that shame is not a neutral moral sentiment but a systemic form of symbolic and psychological violence. The paper proposes a six-part analytical framework: (1) the social distribution of shame as low-cost punishment in family, school, and society; (2) the gendered asymmetry that burdens women disproportionately while exempting men; (3) the aestheticization of violence through subtle cultural ideals, or “graceful suffering”; (4) psychological and neuroscientific evidence showing…

當死亡被神話化:拒絕用「宇宙安排」掩蓋暴力真相!

真正的尊重不是神聖化死者,而是還原其生命、堅持追求真相、伸張正義。我們必須警惕這種宗教化的敘事,因為一旦接受「死亡有其宇宙意義」,就等於默許下一場暴力。文明不是建立在祭品之上,而是建立在守護生命、尊嚴與人權的堅持上!

羊群說:「狼群在亂殺羊,我們就不生小羊了!」

羊說:「狼在亂殺羊,我們就不生小羊。」人說:「狼本來就吃羊啊!」

當千萬人被製造成無聲!

科技沒有帶來幸福,反而方便了起來,想讓幾千萬人的聲音消失就是一瞬間的事!

為了讓於朦朧成為非刑事案件,BIG們要展現隻手遮天。

關於操控輿論,打輿論戰,資訊戰,BIG這個群體目前好像還沒輸過。現在已經強到,不管是簡中世界還是簡中以外的世界,都可以呼風喚雨的程度了。

於朦朧的新的證據鏈,只能說地獄在人間

"The most terrifying evil often comes from ordinary people."最可怕的邪惡,往往來自於平庸的人

權勢、王權、富貴、財閥、霸道面前,誰不是於朦朧呢?

雪花落地,瞬間碎裂,化為污水一般的無力。我想紀念這一刻 —— 為那些堅持自我的人,為那些不願同流合污的人。可是在王權、富貴、財閥、霸道面前,誰不是於朦朧呢?

〈不必點開〉原創理論初稿(無需閱讀)working draft

Structural Traps of Power: Fishpond Effect, Hidden Monopoly Gate, Yin–Yang Monopoly of Rights, and the Ice-Hole Dilemma

?於朦朧之死:誰在掩蓋疑似性虐待與潛規則

誰在急著蓋棺定論?誰在急著蓋棺定論?誰在把合理的問責要求、公開資訊、公開證據、給民眾一個合理交代的呼聲,稱為「陰謀論」、稱為「造謠」?誰在幫助消滅證據,給凶手足夠的逃脫時間,去保證最後的結局一定被定義為——「於朦朧抑鬱自殺」?這些問題,直到今天,依舊沒有任何令人信服的答案。